RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview

Prestige Camden Gardens

PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS · Yelahanka · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/472/PR/140524/006872

Report coverage

Full report — registry facts + unit-level plan intelligence

What this report covers

  • Official K-RERA registry facts — units, cost, land area, towers, approvals
  • Complaint / litigation & compliance history
  • Builder delivery record across their K-RERA portfolio
  • Construction trajectory & sales pace from quarterly filings
  • Site & infrastructure intelligence from the filed sanctioned plan
  • Unit-level plan intelligence — dimensioned layouts, facing, per-block detail

To confirm directly with the builder

  • The filed site plan shows utility infrastructure beside the main building, but not enough flat-side context to identify the most exposed units.
Not yet
Completion certificate
None declared
Legal status
Main building
Utility proximity check
88
Other RERA projects by builder

Decision summary

Overall risk
Medium
Legal riskLow
Delivery riskMedium
Livability riskMedium

Legal = litigation/declared disputes. Delivery = OC status, the project's own registration validity, and builder delay history vs the local benchmark. Livability = whether filed-plan utilities are absent, mapped near a block, or visible but not mappable from the current extraction. Each is a summary of a fact shown elsewhere in this report, not an independent score — verify against the relevant section before relying on it.

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.RERA filing
Parking disclosure is relatively generous: 190 disclosed spaces for 117 registered units (1.62/unit). Confirm whether your quoted unit includes one.RERA filing
STP/transformer infrastructure is shown beside the main residential building on the filed site plan. Exact flat-side exposure still needs builder mapping.Vision-read from plan
7 of 45 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable.RERA filing
3 key buyer paperwork items are not usable in the catalog (Sale deed proforma, Form B declaration, Encumbrance certificate). See "Buyer paperwork readiness" below.RERA filing
100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked in the latest QPR (2025-Q4), but there is no completion certificate on file yet.RERA filing
A complaint on Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I, another project by this promoter, is listed on this project's K-RERA page (CMP/190820/0003964, 20-08-2019): “Seeking Full Refund of all payments done with interest and compensation for delay, fraudulent representation and harassment.” — the complainant's own filed wording. See "Complaints on this project's K-RERA page" in Litigation & compliance.RERA filing
No Association of Allottees on record despite the project reporting 83% built — common-area handover runs through the association, so ask when it will be formed. See "Shared facilities & handover readiness".RERA filing
No completion certificate yet — project hasn't been declared complete.RERA filing
Builder track record: 55 of 88 other projects by this developer are past their declared deadline without an OC.RERA filing
4 standout units worth a second look — e.g. top-right unit at 1460 sqft. See "Standout units" below.Vision-read from plan

What I'd do as a buyer

The shortest version of this report — specific moves for your situation. Not financial advice; each traces to a fact below.

If you're comparing specific flats: ask which side of the main building faces the STP/transformer yard and avoid treating every stack as equally exposed.
If you need a ready-to-move home: treat possession timing as uncertain — this project has no completion certificate on file yet.
If the sales team says inventory is almost gone: use that urgency carefully — the RERA QPR already shows near/full booking, but OC and final handover still need verification.
If the builder can't map your flat number to a spot on the sanctioned plan: pause — you can't verify what you're actually buying until they do.

Who this suits & what to verify

Conditional guidance based on the facts above — not a buy/don't-buy recommendation, and not financial advice. Weigh each point against what matters to you.

No completion certificate yet — best suited to buyers comfortable carrying possession-timeline uncertainty. If you need an OC-in-hand, ready-to-move home, treat this as watch-and-verify, not a sure thing.
The latest QPR shows the project effectively sold out while OC is still pending — check whether possession/amenities/common-area completion are keeping pace with sales.
The filed site plan places STP/transformer infrastructure beside the main residential building. In a single-tower project this is a building-level comfort risk, so verify the exact flat side, floor, and mitigation before booking.
Whatever unit a broker shows you, have the builder map that flat number to its exact block, wing, and floor on the sanctioned plan before booking — the report identifies units by position, not by flat number.

Questions to ask the builder

  • Can you map my specific flat number to its block, wing, and floor on the sanctioned plan?
  • Please have my lawyer verify the conversion order, deed/JDA, khatha, EC, and owner-share rows for the survey numbers listed in the K-RERA land-title table (Own and JDA Land).
  • The K-RERA registration discloses 190 parking spaces for 117 registered units — is my specific parking bay allotted, covered/open, and marked on the sanctioned parking plan?
  • Please match my quoted flat number against the K-RERA official unit register and confirm its carpet area, UDS, floor, tower/wing, and parking-lot count in the agreement draft.
  • The sanctioned site plan shows STP/transformer infrastructure beside the main residential building — which flat stacks and lower floors face it, and what mitigation is built in?
  • What's the realistic timeline to completion certificate, given the current construction stage?
  • Why are these compliance slots still filed as under process / not yet usable: Project Specifications, Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the building, Advocate Search Report?
  • Can you share the current usable version of these buyer paperwork items before I pay a token: Sale deed proforma, Form B declaration, Encumbrance certificate?
  • The latest QPR shows the project effectively sold out but no OC is on file yet — what exactly remains before completion certificate and handover?
  • Why did the latest QPR show escrow withdrawals above buyer collections for that quarter, and which certified construction milestones supported the withdrawal?
  • Can you share recent dated construction photos for my specific block/wing, since no project-photo uploads are visible in the K-RERA catalog?
  • 55 of your other projects in this city are past deadline without an OC — what's different about this one?
117
Registered units
₹83.7 Cr
Est. construction cost
9
Units profiled
52
RERA documents on file

Official Registry Facts

Official project scale

RERA filing

Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.

DisclosureOfficial valueWhy it matters
Registered units117Total inventory registered with K-RERA.
Official carpet area13,970 sqmRegulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums.
Official built-up area31,884 sqmUseful scale context when comparing density and project cost.
Registered land area6,863 sqmThe land area attached to this K-RERA registration.
Sanctioned FAR/FSI3Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design.
Registered towers/wings1Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page.
Parking disclosed178 covered, 12 open (1.62 spaces/unit)Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits.
Approved plan numberBBMP/CC/0559/24-25Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder.
Plan approval date08-04-2024
Project start date01-07-2024

Official inventory & towers

RERA filing

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

Registered inventory mix

TypeUnitsShareOfficial carpet area
Three Bed9682%10,682 sqm
Four Bed2017%3,240 sqm
One Bed11%48 sqm

Registered tower / wing summary

Tower/wingFloorsUnitsParkingHeight
Residential Building 12011717867.95 m

Official unit register

RERA filing

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 117 official flat/unit rows, matching the 117 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

By unit type

Unit typeRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
3BHK39106.9-115.2 sqm51.6-56.8 sqm39
3BHK+MAID’S38124.0 sqm59.9 sqm38
4BHK+MAID’S20162.2 sqm76.2 sqm20
3BHK+2TOI1988.4 sqm44.0 sqm19
1BHK+1TOI148.4 sqm22.9 sqm1

By tower / wing

Tower/wingRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
Residential Building 111748.4-162.2 sqm22.9-76.2 sqm117
Show sample official unit rows
UnitTowerFloorTypeCarpetUDSParking
1011Residential Building 113BHK106.9 sqm51.6 sqm1
1012Residential Building 114BHK+MAID’S162.2 sqm76.2 sqm1
1016Residential Building 113BHK+2TOI88.4 sqm44.0 sqm1
1021Residential Building 123BHK106.9 sqm51.6 sqm1
1022Residential Building 124BHK+MAID’S162.2 sqm76.2 sqm1
1023Residential Building 123BHK115.2 sqm56.8 sqm1

What the numbers tell you

Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.

Unit formatAverage official carpet area is ~1,289 sqft — large-format homes (3BHK-and-up territory), not compact stock. This is a boutique, low-density project — 117 homes across 1 tower. Carpet is the RERA-defined usable area, so compare it against the 'super built-up' a broker quotes (typically 25–35% larger).
ParkingThe project declares 190 parking spaces for 117 homes (~1.6 per home) — comfortable headroom over the 1-per-home many projects offer.
Your land share (UDS)Undivided land share averages ~58 sqm per home; across all 117 homes that is ~94% of the plot — a healthy sign: buyers collectively hold close to all the land. Low UDS relative to land can mean the builder keeps land value the flat owners think they're buying.
Joint-development titleThis is (at least partly) a joint-development (JDA) project — the landowner and developer split the built units per an agreed ratio. Standard in Bengaluru, but it adds one check: confirm in writing that your specific unit falls in the developer's sale share, and ask to see the JDA's area-sharing clause so there's no dispute over who can sell you the flat.

Site & infrastructure

Vision-read from plan

Read directly off the project's site/layout plan filed with K-RERA — where utility infrastructure (sewage treatment, transformers, generators) sits on the plot, and which buildings are closest to it. This is the kind of thing a builder's sales team won't volunteer, but it's public on the filed plan.

⚠ Utility infrastructure is shown beside the proposed residential building on the filed site plan. This is a building-level comfort risk; exact stack/floor exposure still needs the builder to map your flat on the sanctioned plan.

Orientation: upper-right (read from the sheet's own north marker). This tells us roughly how the site sits, not which way any individual unit's balcony faces — we don't have a reliable per-unit facing read, so this report makes no vastu/facing claims.

The sanctioned site plan, as filed

Open full-size image → · On mobile, pan the image sideways to read the labels.

The sanctioned site/layout plan as filed with K-RERA, showing the buildings, amenities and utility infrastructure with the developer's own labels
The developer's own site plan as filed with K-RERA (tap to open full-size) — shown for reference, with its printed labels (STP, transformer/DG yards, building and block numbers) intact. Any highlighted trade-offs below are marked only where the plan's own text confirms them.

The specific trade-offs on this plan

Where a block backs onto a utility on the filed plan, we mark just those towers and that utility — and say how strongly the drawing supports the read, so you know when to treat it as settled and when to confirm on the sanctioned plan.

High-confidence read
Proposed Residential Building back directly onto the 6.9m wide ramp — expect vehicle movement and service noise; weigh that against a block clear of it.
FeaturePosition on site
TRANSFORMER YARDper site plan
STP AT LOWER BASEMENTper site plan

Which Unit to Buy Here

From the sanctioned site plan, we map every block against the amenities worth being near and the utilities worth avoiding, using each item's position on the plan:

✓ Landscape✗ 6.9M Wide Ramp✗ Stp At Lower Basement✗ Transformer Yard

Across the blocks on the plan, Proposed Residential Building (2B+G+1 To 20 Upper Floor Height Of Building 67.96 M) reads best and Proposed Residential Building warrants the most care — details below.

MixedProposed Residential Building (2B+G+1 To 20 Upper Floor Height Of Building 67.96 M) appears on the plan to sit a short distance from the 6.9m wide ramp. This is a low-confidence read of the filed drawing — treat it as a flag to check the 6.9m wide ramp's position on the sanctioned plan, not a settled fact.
Be cautiousProposed Residential Building sits adjoining the 6.9m wide ramp — expect vehicle movement and service noise. Prefer higher floors and the elevation facing away from it, or another block.

Positions are read from the sanctioned plan, not surveyed; distances are relative within the plan, not metres. Treat this as where to look first and what to check on a site visit — not a final verdict.

Two flats in the same project can differ 15–20% in liveability and resale for the same price. Here's how to pick the right one — tower, side, floor, facing, position and size — read off the sanctioned plan and the filed inventory. Directional, not surveyed: verify on a site visit.

2 · Which floor

Target the upper-middle floors: high enough to clear street dust, boundary-wall sightlines, mosquitoes and ground-floor privacy/security worries, but below the very top floor (terrace heat and leak risk). Avoid the ground and first floor (dust, noise, privacy, waterlogging in a bad monsoon) unless you specifically want a private-garden unit and accept the trade-offs. In any tower sitting next to the STP, DG set or transformer, buy higher — odour, generator noise and EMF concentrate at the lower floors. Ask which floors are refuge/service floors and skip the flats directly above or below them.

3 · Which facing

Target North, Northeast and East-facing homes — even, glare-free light all day and no direct heat load — the safe pick. Steer clear of South, West and Southwest-facing living rooms and bedrooms — west/south-west take the full 2–7pm summer sun (heat you pay to fight with the AC all year). A west kitchen or utility is fine; a west master isn't. Confirm the exact facing with a compass on site — brochure 'park-facing' isn't a compass reading.

4 · Which flat on the floor

Prefer a corner unit — two or three external walls mean cross-ventilation, light on more than one side, more windows and a resale premium. Avoid the flat that shares a wall with the lift shaft or staircase (vibration, footfall, less privacy) and the one beside the garbage chute or electrical/meter room. Check the units-per-floor-per-lift ratio — more than ~4 flats sharing one lift core means waits and crowding.

5 · Which size, for value

The 3BHK stock is the liquid part of this project — easiest to rent and to exit, so the safest for capital. The 1BHK / studio units are a thinner resale market (fewer buyers, longer to sell) — only if you'll actually use the space, not as the investment pick. Registered carpet averages 517–1,744 sq ft per home across the filed mix; check the loading (carpet ÷ super-built-up) — under ~65% means you're paying for wall/common area, not home.

If it were my money

I'd target a corner unit on an upper-middle floor, with a north/east-facing living side and in a 3BHK configuration. I'd pass on the Proposed Residential Building tower near the utilities, west/south-west-facing living rooms and bedrooms and anything on the ground/first floor or the top floor.

Plan-derived guidance, not a survey or a vastu consultation — confirm facing, tower distances and floor specifics on site.

How units compare, by configuration

Vision-read from plan

Within each bedroom count, here's the size spread across the units we could confidently profile. Cards marked ★ below are the standouts in their configuration — either the largest (a resale/rental edge) or notably smaller than peers (worth a question to the builder).

ConfigurationUnits profiledRangeAverage
3 BHK7854–1109 sqft984 sqft
4 BHK21167–1460 sqft1314 sqft

Standout units

Vision-read from plan

Room dimensions read directly off the developer's sanctioned building plan filed with K-RERA (vision-extracted, in the units shown on the plan — often metres or millimetres — not an independent survey). Total area below is the sum of labeled enclosed-room dimensions, excluding obvious exterior/open labels such as balconies, terraces, and landscape courts. It is an approximation, not the builder's official carpet/built-up area. Unit labels describe position (block/wing/floor) as drawn on the sheet, not a flat number — the plan doesn't print one. ⚠ cards flag units near utility infrastructure per the site plan (see "Site & infrastructure" above); we don't have a reliable per-unit balcony-facing read, so this report makes no vastu/facing claims for individual units.

Range across profiled units: 854–1460 sqft (avg 1057 sqft)

The 4 units below are worth a second look — the largest in their configuration, notably smaller than peers, or carrying a site-plan caution. Use the browser beneath them to filter every profiled unit by block, configuration, floor, or flag.

top-right unit

1167 sqft (approx., enclosed-room sum)

★ Smaller than the typical 4BHK in this project — worth asking the builder why.

Likely a corner unit (two external-facing walls) — usually better cross-ventilation and natural light than a mid-block unit.

BEDROOM-14.40 x 3.71 m
BEDROOM-33.75 x 4.20 m
BEDROOM-23.65 x 3.60 m
BEDROOM-43.35 x 4.20 m
LIVING/DINING4.40 x 7.92 m
KITCHEN2.50 x 4.25 m
SITOUT1.40 x 3.71 m
TOILET-31.50 x 2.45 m
BALCONY4.25 x 3.65 m

From sanctioned plan, page 5

bottom-right unit (lower floor, right)

854 sqft (approx., enclosed-room sum)

★ Smaller than the typical 3BHK in this project — worth asking the builder why.

Likely a corner unit (two external-facing walls) — usually better cross-ventilation and natural light than a mid-block unit.

M.BEDROOM3.65 x 4.65 m
BEDROOM-23.65 x 3.65 m
BEDROOM-33.35 x 3.65 m
LIVING & DINING3.95 x 7.10 m
TOILET-12.75 x 1.85 m
TOILET-32.45 x 1.50 m
BALCONY3.80 x 1.10 m
BALCONY-23.95 x 4.55 m

From sanctioned plan, page 5

bottom-left unit

1109 sqft (approx., enclosed-room sum)

★ Largest 3BHK profiled here — a resale/rental edge if everything else is equal.

Likely a corner unit (two external-facing walls) — usually better cross-ventilation and natural light than a mid-block unit.

BEDROOM-23.80x3.710 m
BEDROOM-33.35x3.85 m
BEDROOM-14.25x3.65 m
LIVING & DINING3.95x7.27 m
SITOUT3.86x1.30 m
SITOUT-23.95x1.55 m
TOILET2.75x1.86 m
KITCHEN2.70x3.80 m
FOYER2.65x1.65 m
MAID'S ROOM2.310x2.50 m
UTILITY3.80x1.66 m

From sanctioned plan, page 6

top-right unit

1460 sqft (approx., enclosed-room sum)

★ Largest 4BHK profiled here — a resale/rental edge if everything else is equal.

Likely a corner unit (two external-facing walls) — usually better cross-ventilation and natural light than a mid-block unit.

BEDROOM-014.25 x 3.65 m
BEDROOM-23.65 x 3.90 m
BEDROOM-33.75 x 4.20 m
BEDROOM-43.35 x 4.20 m
LIVING/DINING4.40 x 7.92 m
KITCHEN3.80 x 2.70 m
SITOUT4.46 x 2.00 m
WALK-IN2.00 x 3.65 m
FOYER2.50 x 4.25 m
UTILITY3.66 x 1.55 m
TOILET-12.43 x 0.50 m
TOILET-22.50 x 2.48 m

From sanctioned plan, page 6

Density, Parking & Open Space

Density & Parking

The filing gives carpet area (what you legally own) but not the builder's super-built-up, so the loading/efficiency % isn't in the RERA record — ask the builder for it and check carpet is ≥65% of super-built-up before you sign.

Coverage & Open Space

Vision-read from plan

How much of the plot the buildings actually cover, and how close the project ran to its permitted FAR/FSI — context that affects how crowded the site feels day to day, separate from any single unit's own size.

The buildings cover 18% of the site against 50% permitted, so ~82% of the ground stays open — a low-footprint layout that generally feels less crowded and lets in more light than a site built to its coverage limit.

Plot area7166.57 sqmt
Net site area (after road/encroachment deductions)6863.06 sqmt
FAR/FSI allowed3.00
Ground coverage allowed50.00%
Ground coverage achieved18.04%

Read off the site plan's own "Development Plan Area Statement" panel, cross-checked across repeated independent reads — only fields where those reads agreed are shown here.

Land & Title

Land title & ownership

RERA filing

K-RERA land-survey/title rows summarize parcel extent, conversion, deed/JDA, khatha, and owner-share disclosures. 6 survey/parcel rows; land type: Own and JDA Land; 6/6 conversion/alienation marked YES; 6/6 deed marked YES; 6/6 JDA marked YES. Use this as a checklist for your lawyer, not as a substitute for title due diligence.

Survey / parcelLand typeExtentTitle milestonesOwner-share rows
10/2Own and JDA Land16.4 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A KhathaAsma A. (34)
10/3Own and JDA Land16.4 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A KhathaAsma A. (34)
10/4Own and JDA Land16.4 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A KhathaAsma A. (34)
11/2Own and JDA Land0.8 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A KhathaAsma A. (34)
11/3Own and JDA Land10.4 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A KhathaAsma A. (34)
11/4Own and JDA Land0.12.4 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A KhathaAsma A. (34)

Title & buyer-document read-through

RERA filing

For the most buyer-critical non-plan PDFs, the report now downloads the actual filing and extracts conservative text cues. These cues are not legal opinions; they tell your lawyer what the RERA upload appears to contain and which documents need closer review.

DocumentPagesExtracted cues
Commencement / building licence
Cam Den building licence 14068.pdf
6date(s) visible: 17/05/2024; mentions lender/charge/mortgage-type language; contains commencement/building-licence language
JDA / development agreement
JDA 1145 2023 24 Asma PEPL 16 05 2023 camden.pdf
42Document dated 16/05/2023, executed at Bengaluru; Titled 'Joint Development Agreement' (JDA); First Party/Owner identified by name and PAN reference; Second Party identified as a named developer company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956
Land conversion / CLU
Camden CLU 05 05 2023.pdf
4Document dated 05/05/2023; Issued by Bangalore Development Authority (BDA); Titled 'Provisional Certificate' (ಪ್ರಾರಂಭಿಕ ಪ್ರಮಾಣ ಪತ್ರ); References Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act 1961, Section 14-A — land use conversion (CLU) language
Agreement for sale draft
Draft - ATS - Camden - 26-04-2024.pdf
38date(s) visible: 11/05/2012, 21/04/2023, 16/05/2023; contains agreement-for-sale/RERA draft language
Allotment letter draft
Allotment Letter RERA Camden Gardens.pdf
8date(s) visible: 31/12/2027; mentions lender/charge/mortgage-type language

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

Litigation & compliance

RERA filing

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.

⚠ 7 of 45 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Project Specifications, Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the building, Advocate Search Report, Proforma For Sale Deed, Declaration (Form B) and more.

14 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

Named utility/regulatory approvals

Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)✓ On file (Electricity Permission Letter)
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (Water Permission Letter)
Fire NOC✓ On file (Fire Force Department)
Pollution control (KSPCB)✓ On file (KSPCB)
Environmental clearance✓ On file (SEIAA)
Airport Authority height clearance✓ On file (Airport Authority of India)

"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.

Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (61 complaints listed against this promoter)

ComplaintSubject (as filed)ProjectStatus
CMP/190225/0002242
25-02-2019
Builder not paying compensation as per agreement and no handover of apartment after deadlinePRESTIGE WESTWOODS (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AO
CMP/190325/0002508
25-03-2019
Delayed Interest for delayed handoverPrestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AO
CMP/190330/0002539
30-03-2019
Delay in delivery of ProjectPrestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AO
CMP/190419/0002630
19-04-2019
This is to request to adjust against balance or reimburse the amount as per delay clause @ 9% till date on the amount paid. Also to adhere to agreement for handover of flat no 14011 in tower 14Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AO
CMP/190519/0003075
19-05-2019
Prestiege Royale Gardens T2147 Apartmen Dealy in possession, compensation not being pais as per agreementPrestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AO
CMP/190519/0003091
19-05-2019
Undue delay of project completion and Monetary compensation towards that per Construction agreementPrestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AO
CMP/190520/0003069
20-05-2019
There is no OC 2 yrs after promised data of delivery. There is misrepresentation of the tower number scheduled apartment comparing brochure and sanctioned plan.PRESTIGE ROYALE GARDENS PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH
CMP/190614/0003288
14-06-2019
Delay in delivery and compensation not paidPRESTIGE ROYALE GARDENS PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AO

Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.

Statutory approval status

RERA filing

Clean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including Fire NOC, environmental clearance and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.

4 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.

Authority / NOCStatusDateFile
Water supply and sewage boardApproved20-11-2023BWSSB NOC.pdf
KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres)Approved25-01-2024PCB.pdf
KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres)Approved29-11-2023MOEF.pdf
KPTCL- BESCOMApproved21-10-2023BESCOM NOC.pdf
Fire and SafetyApproved19-01-2024FIRE NOC.pdf
Airport Authority of IndiaApproved23-04-2024AIRPORT NOC.pdf

Project team & certifications

RERA filing

K-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

RoleNameRegistration / licenceSinceLocality
Chartered accountantM Padmanabha Bhat0253051986Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560093
EngineerMr. H G NaikarBCCL/BL-3.6/SE- 0306/2018-192000Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560092
ArchitectZachariah ConsultantsCA/2010/4702016Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560025
ContractorK2K Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd-2007Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001

Facilities & Paperwork Readiness

Shared facilities & handover readiness

RERA filing

21 applicable shared facility/common-area rows; the completion-% column is blank/zero for every row, which on a project already ~83% built means the builder hasn't updated this field — not that no common-area work is done. Use the list below as the scope to confirm, and ask for current dated progress on these shared works before handover.

⚠ K-RERA's page records no Association of Allottees formed yet. Common-area handover runs through the association, so for a project this far along ask the builder when it will be formed and what happens to maintenance charges until then.

Common areas

WorkLatest completionFiled area
BasementNot stated9,468 sqm
Common entrance and exit for the building/common portico/foyer/verandahNot stated264 sqm
Corridor/LobbiesNot stated3,193 sqm
Fire escapesNot stated402 sqm
LiftsNot stated433 sqm
Open parking areasNot stated165 sqm
Outer WallNot stated1 sqm
StaircasesNot stated402 sqm
TerraceNot stated1,107 sqm
Water conservation and renewable energyNot stated1 sqm

Amenities

WorkLatest completionFiled area
CCTV SurveillanceNot stated10 sqm
Club HouseNot stated818 sqm
Community HallNot stated98 sqm
ElectricityNot stated145 sqm
GymNot stated116 sqm
Indoor Sports facilityNot stated230 sqm
Outdoor Sports facilityNot stated180 sqm
ParksNot stated299 sqm
Power BackupNot stated183 sqm
Swimming PoolNot stated322 sqm

Showing 10 of 11 applicable rows, prioritizing low or unstated completion.

Buyer paperwork readiness

RERA filing

Key legal and booking documents surfaced from the K-RERA catalog. This is not legal advice and does not replace a lawyer's title due diligence, but it shows which drafts/filings are actually visible before you pay a token or sign.

Document typeStatusCatalog file
Agreement for sale draftOn fileDraft - ATS - Camden - 26-04-2024.pdf
Allotment letter draftOn fileAllotment Letter RERA Camden Gardens.pdf
Sale deed proformaPlaceholder / not usableUnder process.pdf
Form B declarationPlaceholder / not usableUnder process.pdf
Commencement certificateOn fileCam Den building licence 14068.pdf
Encumbrance certificateNot found in catalog
Land conversion / CLUOn fileCamden CLU 05 05 2023.pdf
JDA / development agreementOn fileJDA 1145 2023 24 Asma PEPL 16 05 2023 camden.pdf

Treat placeholders and missing rows as questions, not accusations: ask the builder for the current document and have your lawyer review the actual signed version before committing.

Builder track record

RERA filing

Prestige has 88 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Prestige Estates”) (average reported construction progress 61%). 55 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.

Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder's other K-RERA registrations and check whether they've actually been delivered.

Financials & Construction Progress

Financial disclosures

RERA filing

Latest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹8.66 Cr collected from buyers, ₹8.85 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹8.85 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹8.66 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.

Construction progress48% → 83% (+35 pts)
Units sold/booked as registered117/117 (100%)
Buyer collections in available QPRs₹22.78 Cr
Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs₹22.83 Cr (1.00x collections)

QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹71.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.

RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank M G Road IFSC Code : ICIC0000002 Pin Code : 560025. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

How to use this report

If a builder or broker has shown you a specific unit: the sanctioned plan filed with K-RERA usually doesn't print flat numbers directly — it identifies units by block, wing, and floor. Find the card in the unit-level section matching your unit's location and bedroom count, then compare its room sizes and total area against other units of the same configuration in this project. If yours is noticeably smaller for the same number of bedrooms, that's worth asking the builder about directly.

Before signing anything: check the litigation & compliance section above — any declared dispute on the project should factor into your decision.

Want to verify something yourself? Every document this report draws from is listed in the catalog just below, with a direct link to K-RERA's own copy.

How confident is each fact? Every section is tagged by source:

RERA filing Highest confidence — read straight off the K-RERA registry (registration, OC status, litigation, builder history, the document list). Verifiable against the filings.
Vision-read from plan Approximate — read by AI vision off the developer's scanned plan PDFs (room dimensions, unit areas, where infrastructure sits). Good signal, but it's OCR of a noisy scan, not a survey — confirm anything decision-critical against the linked plan.
Inferred Lowest confidence — a heuristic layered on the above (e.g. approximate compass facing, corner-unit guess). Directional only; never a substitute for a site visit or a vastu consultation.

Document catalog

RERA filing

Every document row on file with K-RERA for this project. Plan-like filings are processed for report intelligence when usable; buyer-critical support PDFs are selectively downloaded for read-through; placeholder uploads are shown as not usable; other compliance documents link directly to K-RERA's own copy.

DocumentFilenameStatus
Registration CertificateCOI PEPL.pdfView on K-RERA →
PAN CardPAN PEPL.pdfView on K-RERA →
Address ProofPEPL GST Certificate.pdfView on K-RERA →
Board Resolution for Authorized Signatory/Certificate of AuthorizationAuthorisation letter.pdfView on K-RERA →
PAN CardPAN SA.pdfView on K-RERA →
PAN CardPAN IR.PDFView on K-RERA →
Organization StructureOrg Chart.pdfView on K-RERA →
AffidavitJoint Affidavit 05 05 24.pdfView on K-RERA →
Certificate from Chartered AccountForm 1 CA Certificate Camden Gardens.pdfView on K-RERA →
Commencement CertificateCam Den building licence 14068.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Electricity Permission LetterCamden BESCOM NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
Water Permission LetterCamden BWSSB NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
Approved Layout PlanCamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Approved Building/Plotting PlanCamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Existing Layout PlanCamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Existing Section Plan and SpecificationCamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Sectional Drawing of the apartmentsCamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Project SpecificationsUnder process.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Approved Section Of Building/Infrastructure Plan of PlottingCamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Area Development Plan Of Project AreaCamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the buildingUnder process.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Advocate Search ReportUnder process.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Urban Land CeilingNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Collaboration Agreement/Development Agreement/Joint Development Agreement/Other AgreementJDA 1145 2023 24 Asma PEPL 16 05 2023 camden.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Change of Land UseCamden CLU 05 05 2023.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
District MagistrateNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Conversion Certificate under section 95 of the KLR Act 1964Camden CLU 05 05 2023.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Any other document (Rights/Title/Interest/Name)Not applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Proforma of Agreement for SaleDraft - ATS - Camden - 26-04-2024.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Proforma of Allotment LetterAllotment Letter RERA Camden Gardens.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Proforma For Sale DeedUnder process.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Declaration (Form B)Under process.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Section 3(1) Notarized AffidavitUnder process.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
JD AFFIDAVIT CUM DECLARATIONUnder process.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
ESCOM/ElectricityCamden BESCOM NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
KWSSB/WaterCamden BWSSB NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
Approval/NOC under section 109 of KLR Act 1961Camden CLU 05 05 2023.pdfView on K-RERA →
Approval/NOC under section 14 of the KTCP ActNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Fire Force DepartmentCamden KSFES NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
Airport Authority of IndiaCamden HAL NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
KSPCBCamden KSPCB NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
SEIAACamden ENVIRONMENTAL CLERANCE.pdfView on K-RERA →
BSNLNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Lift AuthoritiesNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
BMRCLNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
NOC in case of building proposals abutting to neighbouring propertiesNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Bangalore Urban Arts CommissionNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Inspector Of Factories Controller Of Explosives RailwaysNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Coastal Regulation Zone AuthorityNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Utilisation certificateNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Transfer of development rights certificateNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Relinquishment DeedNot applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable

Request the report on Prestige Camden Gardens

We analyse Prestige Camden Gardens in full and send you the RERA Property Intelligence Report — we analyse in 1 working day.

Something went wrong — email hello@quietlist.in instead.