RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS · Yelahanka · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/472/PR/140524/006872
Report coverage
Full report — registry facts + unit-level plan intelligence
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
Report map
The shortest version of this report — specific moves for your situation. Not financial advice; each traces to a fact below.
Conditional guidance based on the facts above — not a buy/don't-buy recommendation, and not financial advice. Weigh each point against what matters to you.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 117 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 13,970 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Official built-up area | 31,884 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 6,863 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 178 covered, 12 open (1.62 spaces/unit) | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Approved plan number | BBMP/CC/0559/24-25 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 08-04-2024 | |
| Project start date | 01-07-2024 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Three Bed | 96 | 82% | 10,682 sqm |
| Four Bed | 20 | 17% | 3,240 sqm |
| One Bed | 1 | 1% | 48 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residential Building 1 | 20 | 117 | 178 | 67.95 m |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 117 official flat/unit rows, matching the 117 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 39 | 106.9-115.2 sqm | 51.6-56.8 sqm | 39 |
| 3BHK+MAID’S | 38 | 124.0 sqm | 59.9 sqm | 38 |
| 4BHK+MAID’S | 20 | 162.2 sqm | 76.2 sqm | 20 |
| 3BHK+2TOI | 19 | 88.4 sqm | 44.0 sqm | 19 |
| 1BHK+1TOI | 1 | 48.4 sqm | 22.9 sqm | 1 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residential Building 1 | 117 | 48.4-162.2 sqm | 22.9-76.2 sqm | 117 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1011 | Residential Building 1 | 1 | 3BHK | 106.9 sqm | 51.6 sqm | 1 |
| 1012 | Residential Building 1 | 1 | 4BHK+MAID’S | 162.2 sqm | 76.2 sqm | 1 |
| 1016 | Residential Building 1 | 1 | 3BHK+2TOI | 88.4 sqm | 44.0 sqm | 1 |
| 1021 | Residential Building 1 | 2 | 3BHK | 106.9 sqm | 51.6 sqm | 1 |
| 1022 | Residential Building 1 | 2 | 4BHK+MAID’S | 162.2 sqm | 76.2 sqm | 1 |
| 1023 | Residential Building 1 | 2 | 3BHK | 115.2 sqm | 56.8 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
Read directly off the project's site/layout plan filed with K-RERA — where utility infrastructure (sewage treatment, transformers, generators) sits on the plot, and which buildings are closest to it. This is the kind of thing a builder's sales team won't volunteer, but it's public on the filed plan.
⚠ Utility infrastructure is shown beside the proposed residential building on the filed site plan. This is a building-level comfort risk; exact stack/floor exposure still needs the builder to map your flat on the sanctioned plan.
Orientation: upper-right (read from the sheet's own north marker). This tells us roughly how the site sits, not which way any individual unit's balcony faces — we don't have a reliable per-unit facing read, so this report makes no vastu/facing claims.
The sanctioned site plan, as filed
Open full-size image → · On mobile, pan the image sideways to read the labels.
The specific trade-offs on this plan
Where a block backs onto a utility on the filed plan, we mark just those towers and that utility — and say how strongly the drawing supports the read, so you know when to treat it as settled and when to confirm on the sanctioned plan.
| Feature | Position on site |
|---|---|
| TRANSFORMER YARD | per site plan |
| STP AT LOWER BASEMENT | per site plan |
From the sanctioned site plan, we map every block against the amenities worth being near and the utilities worth avoiding, using each item's position on the plan:
Across the blocks on the plan, Proposed Residential Building (2B+G+1 To 20 Upper Floor Height Of Building 67.96 M) reads best and Proposed Residential Building warrants the most care — details below.
Positions are read from the sanctioned plan, not surveyed; distances are relative within the plan, not metres. Treat this as where to look first and what to check on a site visit — not a final verdict.
Two flats in the same project can differ 15–20% in liveability and resale for the same price. Here's how to pick the right one — tower, side, floor, facing, position and size — read off the sanctioned plan and the filed inventory. Directional, not surveyed: verify on a site visit.
2 · Which floor
Target the upper-middle floors: high enough to clear street dust, boundary-wall sightlines, mosquitoes and ground-floor privacy/security worries, but below the very top floor (terrace heat and leak risk). Avoid the ground and first floor (dust, noise, privacy, waterlogging in a bad monsoon) unless you specifically want a private-garden unit and accept the trade-offs. In any tower sitting next to the STP, DG set or transformer, buy higher — odour, generator noise and EMF concentrate at the lower floors. Ask which floors are refuge/service floors and skip the flats directly above or below them.
3 · Which facing
Target North, Northeast and East-facing homes — even, glare-free light all day and no direct heat load — the safe pick. Steer clear of South, West and Southwest-facing living rooms and bedrooms — west/south-west take the full 2–7pm summer sun (heat you pay to fight with the AC all year). A west kitchen or utility is fine; a west master isn't. Confirm the exact facing with a compass on site — brochure 'park-facing' isn't a compass reading.
4 · Which flat on the floor
Prefer a corner unit — two or three external walls mean cross-ventilation, light on more than one side, more windows and a resale premium. Avoid the flat that shares a wall with the lift shaft or staircase (vibration, footfall, less privacy) and the one beside the garbage chute or electrical/meter room. Check the units-per-floor-per-lift ratio — more than ~4 flats sharing one lift core means waits and crowding.
5 · Which size, for value
The 3BHK stock is the liquid part of this project — easiest to rent and to exit, so the safest for capital. The 1BHK / studio units are a thinner resale market (fewer buyers, longer to sell) — only if you'll actually use the space, not as the investment pick. Registered carpet averages 517–1,744 sq ft per home across the filed mix; check the loading (carpet ÷ super-built-up) — under ~65% means you're paying for wall/common area, not home.
If it were my money
I'd target a corner unit on an upper-middle floor, with a north/east-facing living side and in a 3BHK configuration. I'd pass on the Proposed Residential Building tower near the utilities, west/south-west-facing living rooms and bedrooms and anything on the ground/first floor or the top floor.
Plan-derived guidance, not a survey or a vastu consultation — confirm facing, tower distances and floor specifics on site.
Within each bedroom count, here's the size spread across the units we could confidently profile. Cards marked ★ below are the standouts in their configuration — either the largest (a resale/rental edge) or notably smaller than peers (worth a question to the builder).
| Configuration | Units profiled | Range | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK | 7 | 854–1109 sqft | 984 sqft |
| 4 BHK | 2 | 1167–1460 sqft | 1314 sqft |
Room dimensions read directly off the developer's sanctioned building plan filed with K-RERA (vision-extracted, in the units shown on the plan — often metres or millimetres — not an independent survey). Total area below is the sum of labeled enclosed-room dimensions, excluding obvious exterior/open labels such as balconies, terraces, and landscape courts. It is an approximation, not the builder's official carpet/built-up area. Unit labels describe position (block/wing/floor) as drawn on the sheet, not a flat number — the plan doesn't print one. ⚠ cards flag units near utility infrastructure per the site plan (see "Site & infrastructure" above); we don't have a reliable per-unit balcony-facing read, so this report makes no vastu/facing claims for individual units.
Range across profiled units: 854–1460 sqft (avg 1057 sqft)
The 4 units below are worth a second look — the largest in their configuration, notably smaller than peers, or carrying a site-plan caution. Use the browser beneath them to filter every profiled unit by block, configuration, floor, or flag.
top-right unit
1167 sqft (approx., enclosed-room sum)
★ Smaller than the typical 4BHK in this project — worth asking the builder why.
Likely a corner unit (two external-facing walls) — usually better cross-ventilation and natural light than a mid-block unit.
From sanctioned plan, page 5
bottom-right unit (lower floor, right)
854 sqft (approx., enclosed-room sum)
★ Smaller than the typical 3BHK in this project — worth asking the builder why.
Likely a corner unit (two external-facing walls) — usually better cross-ventilation and natural light than a mid-block unit.
From sanctioned plan, page 5
bottom-left unit
1109 sqft (approx., enclosed-room sum)
★ Largest 3BHK profiled here — a resale/rental edge if everything else is equal.
Likely a corner unit (two external-facing walls) — usually better cross-ventilation and natural light than a mid-block unit.
From sanctioned plan, page 6
top-right unit
1460 sqft (approx., enclosed-room sum)
★ Largest 4BHK profiled here — a resale/rental edge if everything else is equal.
Likely a corner unit (two external-facing walls) — usually better cross-ventilation and natural light than a mid-block unit.
From sanctioned plan, page 6
The filing gives carpet area (what you legally own) but not the builder's super-built-up, so the loading/efficiency % isn't in the RERA record — ask the builder for it and check carpet is ≥65% of super-built-up before you sign.
How much of the plot the buildings actually cover, and how close the project ran to its permitted FAR/FSI — context that affects how crowded the site feels day to day, separate from any single unit's own size.
The buildings cover 18% of the site against 50% permitted, so ~82% of the ground stays open — a low-footprint layout that generally feels less crowded and lets in more light than a site built to its coverage limit.
| Plot area | 7166.57 sqmt |
| Net site area (after road/encroachment deductions) | 6863.06 sqmt |
| FAR/FSI allowed | 3.00 |
| Ground coverage allowed | 50.00% |
| Ground coverage achieved | 18.04% |
Read off the site plan's own "Development Plan Area Statement" panel, cross-checked across repeated independent reads — only fields where those reads agreed are shown here.
K-RERA land-survey/title rows summarize parcel extent, conversion, deed/JDA, khatha, and owner-share disclosures. 6 survey/parcel rows; land type: Own and JDA Land; 6/6 conversion/alienation marked YES; 6/6 deed marked YES; 6/6 JDA marked YES. Use this as a checklist for your lawyer, not as a substitute for title due diligence.
| Survey / parcel | Land type | Extent | Title milestones | Owner-share rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/2 | Own and JDA Land | 16.4 Guntas | Conv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A Khatha | Asma A. (34) |
| 10/3 | Own and JDA Land | 16.4 Guntas | Conv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A Khatha | Asma A. (34) |
| 10/4 | Own and JDA Land | 16.4 Guntas | Conv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A Khatha | Asma A. (34) |
| 11/2 | Own and JDA Land | 0.8 Guntas | Conv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A Khatha | Asma A. (34) |
| 11/3 | Own and JDA Land | 10.4 Guntas | Conv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A Khatha | Asma A. (34) |
| 11/4 | Own and JDA Land | 0.12.4 Guntas | Conv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · A Khatha | Asma A. (34) |
For the most buyer-critical non-plan PDFs, the report now downloads the actual filing and extracts conservative text cues. These cues are not legal opinions; they tell your lawyer what the RERA upload appears to contain and which documents need closer review.
| Document | Pages | Extracted cues |
|---|---|---|
| Commencement / building licence Cam Den building licence 14068.pdf | 6 | date(s) visible: 17/05/2024; mentions lender/charge/mortgage-type language; contains commencement/building-licence language |
| JDA / development agreement JDA 1145 2023 24 Asma PEPL 16 05 2023 camden.pdf | 42 | Document dated 16/05/2023, executed at Bengaluru; Titled 'Joint Development Agreement' (JDA); First Party/Owner identified by name and PAN reference; Second Party identified as a named developer company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 |
| Land conversion / CLU Camden CLU 05 05 2023.pdf | 4 | Document dated 05/05/2023; Issued by Bangalore Development Authority (BDA); Titled 'Provisional Certificate' (ಪ್ರಾರಂಭಿಕ ಪ್ರಮಾಣ ಪತ್ರ); References Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act 1961, Section 14-A — land use conversion (CLU) language |
| Agreement for sale draft Draft - ATS - Camden - 26-04-2024.pdf | 38 | date(s) visible: 11/05/2012, 21/04/2023, 16/05/2023; contains agreement-for-sale/RERA draft language |
| Allotment letter draft Allotment Letter RERA Camden Gardens.pdf | 8 | date(s) visible: 31/12/2027; mentions lender/charge/mortgage-type language |
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
⚠ 7 of 45 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Project Specifications, Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the building, Advocate Search Report, Proforma For Sale Deed, Declaration (Form B) and more.
14 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (61 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190225/0002242 25-02-2019 | Builder not paying compensation as per agreement and no handover of apartment after deadline | PRESTIGE WESTWOODS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190325/0002508 25-03-2019 | Delayed Interest for delayed handover | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190330/0002539 30-03-2019 | Delay in delivery of Project | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190419/0002630 19-04-2019 | This is to request to adjust against balance or reimburse the amount as per delay clause @ 9% till date on the amount paid. Also to adhere to agreement for handover of flat no 14011 in tower 14 | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190519/0003075 19-05-2019 | Prestiege Royale Gardens T2147 Apartmen Dealy in possession, compensation not being pais as per agreement | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190519/0003091 19-05-2019 | Undue delay of project completion and Monetary compensation towards that per Construction agreement | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190520/0003069 20-05-2019 | There is no OC 2 yrs after promised data of delivery. There is misrepresentation of the tower number scheduled apartment comparing brochure and sanctioned plan. | PRESTIGE ROYALE GARDENS PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/190614/0003288 14-06-2019 | Delay in delivery and compensation not paid | PRESTIGE ROYALE GARDENS PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Clean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including Fire NOC, environmental clearance and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.
4 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 20-11-2023 | BWSSB NOC.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 25-01-2024 | PCB.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 29-11-2023 | MOEF.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 21-10-2023 | BESCOM NOC.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 19-01-2024 | FIRE NOC.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 23-04-2024 | AIRPORT NOC.pdf |
K-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | M Padmanabha Bhat | 025305 | 1986 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560093 |
| Engineer | Mr. H G Naikar | BCCL/BL-3.6/SE- 0306/2018-19 | 2000 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560092 |
| Architect | Zachariah Consultants | CA/2010/470 | 2016 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560025 |
| Contractor | K2K Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd | - | 2007 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001 |
Prestige has 88 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Prestige Estates”) (average reported construction progress 61%). 55 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder's other K-RERA registrations and check whether they've actually been delivered.
Latest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹8.66 Cr collected from buyers, ₹8.85 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹8.85 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹8.66 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 48% → 83% (+35 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 117/117 (100%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹22.78 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹22.83 Cr (1.00x collections) |
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹71.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank M G Road IFSC Code : ICIC0000002 Pin Code : 560025. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
If a builder or broker has shown you a specific unit: the sanctioned plan filed with K-RERA usually doesn't print flat numbers directly — it identifies units by block, wing, and floor. Find the card in the unit-level section matching your unit's location and bedroom count, then compare its room sizes and total area against other units of the same configuration in this project. If yours is noticeably smaller for the same number of bedrooms, that's worth asking the builder about directly.
Before signing anything: check the litigation & compliance section above — any declared dispute on the project should factor into your decision.
Want to verify something yourself? Every document this report draws from is listed in the catalog just below, with a direct link to K-RERA's own copy.
How confident is each fact? Every section is tagged by source:
Every document row on file with K-RERA for this project. Plan-like filings are processed for report intelligence when usable; buyer-critical support PDFs are selectively downloaded for read-through; placeholder uploads are shown as not usable; other compliance documents link directly to K-RERA's own copy.
| Document | Filename | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Registration Certificate | COI PEPL.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| PAN Card | PAN PEPL.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| Address Proof | PEPL GST Certificate.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| Board Resolution for Authorized Signatory/Certificate of Authorization | Authorisation letter.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| PAN Card | PAN SA.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| PAN Card | PAN IR.PDF | View on K-RERA → |
| Organization Structure | Org Chart.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| Affidavit | Joint Affidavit 05 05 24.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| Certificate from Chartered Account | Form 1 CA Certificate Camden Gardens.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| Commencement Certificate | Cam Den building licence 14068.pdf | Downloaded for read-through → |
| Electricity Permission Letter | Camden BESCOM NOC.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| Water Permission Letter | Camden BWSSB NOC.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| Approved Layout Plan | CamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdf | Processed for plan intelligence |
| Approved Building/Plotting Plan | CamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdf | Processed for plan intelligence |
| Existing Layout Plan | CamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdf | Processed for plan intelligence |
| Existing Section Plan and Specification | CamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdf | Processed for plan intelligence |
| Sectional Drawing of the apartments | CamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdf | Processed for plan intelligence |
| Project Specifications | Under process.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Approved Section Of Building/Infrastructure Plan of Plotting | CamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdf | Processed for plan intelligence |
| Area Development Plan Of Project Area | CamDen building sanction 14068 dwg.pdf | Processed for plan intelligence |
| Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the building | Under process.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Advocate Search Report | Under process.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Urban Land Ceiling | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Collaboration Agreement/Development Agreement/Joint Development Agreement/Other Agreement | JDA 1145 2023 24 Asma PEPL 16 05 2023 camden.pdf | Downloaded for read-through → |
| Change of Land Use | Camden CLU 05 05 2023.pdf | Downloaded for read-through → |
| District Magistrate | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Conversion Certificate under section 95 of the KLR Act 1964 | Camden CLU 05 05 2023.pdf | Downloaded for read-through → |
| Any other document (Rights/Title/Interest/Name) | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Proforma of Agreement for Sale | Draft - ATS - Camden - 26-04-2024.pdf | Downloaded for read-through → |
| Proforma of Allotment Letter | Allotment Letter RERA Camden Gardens.pdf | Downloaded for read-through → |
| Proforma For Sale Deed | Under process.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Declaration (Form B) | Under process.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Section 3(1) Notarized Affidavit | Under process.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| JD AFFIDAVIT CUM DECLARATION | Under process.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| ESCOM/Electricity | Camden BESCOM NOC.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| KWSSB/Water | Camden BWSSB NOC.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| Approval/NOC under section 109 of KLR Act 1961 | Camden CLU 05 05 2023.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| Approval/NOC under section 14 of the KTCP Act | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Fire Force Department | Camden KSFES NOC.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| Airport Authority of India | Camden HAL NOC.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| KSPCB | Camden KSPCB NOC.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| SEIAA | Camden ENVIRONMENTAL CLERANCE.pdf | View on K-RERA → |
| BSNL | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Lift Authorities | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| BMRCL | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| NOC in case of building proposals abutting to neighbouring properties | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Bangalore Urban Arts Commission | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Inspector Of Factories Controller Of Explosives Railways | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Coastal Regulation Zone Authority | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Utilisation certificate | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Transfer of development rights certificate | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
| Relinquishment Deed | Not applicable.pdf | Placeholder / not usable |
Request the report on Prestige Camden Gardens
We analyse Prestige Camden Gardens in full and send you the RERA Property Intelligence Report — we analyse in 1 working day.
Should you buy in Prestige Camden Gardens?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
₹4,999 · delivered within 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · 9028056255@idfcfirst
Paying from outside India? Pay $99 via PayPal or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.